I want to confirm a question.
basically in this method. it allows writing some “try” functions when we want to implement concurrent handling. but if one of the functions throws an error. all of remaining tasks will be cancelled.
also we cant get any result.
The way to avoid it is to use “group.waitForAll”. it will throw an error. but the remaining tasks will still be executed.
My understanding is correct?
then I think maybe “withTaskGroup” + “Result” will be a better way.